The Legal Profession Act 2007 (LPA) regulates the obligation to disclose legal costs to clients, their rights, and how that disclosure should be made. The LPA enables this obligation to be met through a costs agreement or a separate notice with costs disclosure.
This regulatory guide provides an overview on issues around costs disclosure and costs agreements, including the Commission’s view on some of these issues.
A properly made costs agreement is a contractual agreement for the payment of legal costs. It may also deal with other rights and responsibilities between the law practice and client.
A costs disclosure is information a law practice must give to a client disclosing certain information and rights about the charging of legal costs.
In practice, the interplay between costs agreements and costs disclosure often takes the physical form of a client services agreement with an attached document providing the required costs disclosure information.
Part 3.4 of the LPA deals with obligations around costs disclosure and costs agreements.
These objectives sit within the broader purpose of the LPA, to protect the consumers of legal services and the public generally.
When assessing conduct issues around non-compliance with costs disclosure and costs agreement obligations, the Commission will have regard to these purposes. This aligns with the approach taken by the courts (see Connollys Lawyers Pty Ltd v Davis [2013] QCA 231, [21].), and the usual rules of statutory construction.
Disclosure to clients must be made in writing before, or as soon as practicable after, the law practice is retained. This must be expressed in plain language, and may be in a language other than English if required for the client.
Law practices that want to engage a second law practice on behalf of a client have additional disclosure requirements.
The definition of law practice encompasses barristers, so this typically arises (but is not limited to) where a solicitor wants to retain a barrister on a matter.
In these circumstances, the first law practice needs to disclose to the client the basis on which the second law practice’s costs will be calculated, an estimate of total legal costs of the second law practice, and any billing interval details of the second law practice .
The second law practice (e.g. a barrister) does not have to make disclosure to the client, however they need to provide enough information to the first law practice (e.g. the solicitor) to allow it to meet its disclosure obligations to the client.
In certain circumstances additional disclosure will need to be made to clients:
The LPA also requires that law practices must provide ongoing disclosure to a client.
This means the law practice must disclose in writing any substantial change to anything already disclosed as soon as reasonably practicable.
This is particularly important for previously disclosed estimates of total costs and disclosed ranges of total legal costs.
Where a law practice has made initial disclosure of legal costs in their costs agreement, updated estimates will be required where there has been a substantial change.
Regularly issuing invoices that total more than previously provided estimates may not be enough to comply with this requirement (Connollys Lawyers Pty Ltd v Davis) at [22]
Law practices need to proactively provide updated disclosure to clients and should not rely on clients calculating from invoices that legal costs are more than the disclosed estimates.
Law practices may make disclosure of legal costs by reference to ‘stages’ of work.
Where there is a substantial change to a stage, the law practice must communicate a fresh cost estimate or range of estimates for that stage (Setschnjak v Derek Geddes Pty Ltd [2017] QCAT 9, [152]).
Law practices and legal practitioners must be diligent in considering whether an initial costs disclosure for a stage is still sufficient.
There are some limited circumstances in which a law practice will not need to provide detailed costs disclosure in the form required by the LPA, including:
Where it becomes apparent that legal costs are likely to exceed $1500, practitioners need to be aware of the ongoing duty of disclosure and should provide an updated estimate of costs alongside full costs disclosure.
A failure to comply with costs disclosure obligations may amount to unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct.
For the law practice, the effect may be that any costs agreement may be set aside.
Further, the law practice may not be able to recover any legal costs until there has been a costs assessment.
Non-compliant costs disclosure may also affect any costs assessment, as the normal rule that a cost assessor must have regard to the provisions of a costs agreement specifying the amount of the costs, or how they are to be calculated, may be displaced where cost disclosure obligations have not been met.
The costs assessor may also reduce the legal costs proportionate to the seriousness of the failure to disclose.
The LPA requires that a cost agreement be written or evidenced in writing. It must state:
Costs agreements that do not comply with these requirements are void.
Costs agreements which include contingency fees—fees calculated by reference to money or the value of property recovered—are prohibited.
The maximum penalty for entering into a contingent costs agreement is 100 penalty units. Further, a law practice may not recover any amount relating to the provision of legal services under a contingent cost agreement and must repay any amounts received.
Commonly known as ‘no win, no fee’ agreements, conditional costs agreements occur where payment of all or part of the legal costs are conditional on the successful outcome of the matter.
Conditional costs agreements cannot be made for criminal proceedings or proceedings under the Family Law Act 1975.
To be valid, a conditional costs agreement (other than where the client is a ‘sophisticated client’ or another law practice) must:
The agreement also needs to clearly state what a successful outcome is for the matter.
A client may be required to pay disbursements under a conditional costs agreement, regardless of outcome.
However, the costs agreement must clearly notify the client if this is the case.
A conditional costs agreement may charge an uplift fee, but where it does, the LPA requires it to:
A law practice will not be able to recover uplift fees where it fails to comply with the LPA requirements.
Fixed fee costs agreements are costs agreements where the law practice and a client agree on a fixed price for a law practice’s legal services prior to those services being supplied.
These contrast with more traditional time costed agreements where the law practice charges hourly fees (often) in increments of 5, 6 or 10 minute units of time.
Fixed fee costs agreements are not mutually exclusive with other types of costs agreement.
A costs agreement with a client may be, for example, a hybrid of both traditional time costing and fixed fee agreements for different stages of work.
Regardless of the ultimate form the fixed fee costs agreement takes, it will remain subject to the same costs disclosure obligations and costs agreement requirements as other types of costs agreement.
In particular, fixed fee costs may still be subject to a costs assessment, and itemised bills must still be provided on request.
Where a law practice enters into a conditional costs agreement for a speculative personal injury claim, the LPA imposes a cap on the maximum claim related costs the law practice may recover.
This is commonly called the 50/50 rule.
The 50/50 rule limits the fees a law practice can charge and recover to no more than half of what the client is entitled to receive under a judgment or settlement, after any refunds and disbursements are deduced from that amount.
Claim related costs refers to the total of the legal costs for the claim and any additional amounts for the claim.
Legal costs are the amount that a person has been or may be charged or become liable to pay to a law practice for the provision of legal services, including interest on those amounts.
They do not include disbursements and interest on disbursements.
Additional amounts include, but are not limited to:
This means that interest and additional amounts are treated as legal costs and not as disbursements when calculating the maximum amount that may be charged and recovered.
Amounts paid to a barrister engaged for services after a notice of claim is given are not included in additional amounts.
The 50/50 rule creates a maximum amount of claim related costs that may be charged and is in addition to the other requirements for costs agreements in the LPA.
If the law practice wants to charge for claim related costs above the cap, it must apply in writing to the:
If a costs agreement is not fair or reasonable, a client may apply to court or the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) to set it aside.
When determining if the costs agreement is fair or reasonable, matters the court or QCAT may consider include, but are not limited to:
